Philosophy of Change. Way of knowledge and happiness

Philosophy of Change. Way of knowledge and happiness

When we talk about the concept of "change" we are talking about everything that is related to the human being and can be changed, such as beliefs, customs, ethics, environment, field of work, study, friends, way of living, etc. ... which affects and affects each of us. And if we look at the positions of many young people in these days of "change" we find that we oscillate between a completely hostile to change, and another believes that change is the only constant in the life of each seeker of happiness and success, is change in itself Is the path of success and happiness? Why do some reject change? Which of them are right, you see?

To be able to answer these questions and to arrive at the real concept of change we have to analyze the vision of each stream separately.

Anti-change

We can divide the anti-change categories into three common categories in result but with different introductions:
The first category: believes that if the change is meant to "move from one to the other", it is indispensable! Why? Because it is satisfied with what has reached it, there is nothing better or healthier than what it has, thought it or actually, and in the sense of the owner of this vision sees that he has "reached the top" Why seek to subject his ideas or objectives or lifestyle to the examination and testing to see if Is there something better or healthier than what it is ?!

The second category can be summed up in its vision that "we know it better than the non-forbidden." This phobia or fear of shaking beliefs when tested means that the owners of this vision decided to disrupt what distinguishes them from other creatures, namely "mind and free will" and chose to put their destiny in my hands "Their parents or the environment in which they grew up" or in the hands of "those who can guide them according to their interests" and we may also be one of those without realizing it! If you want to make sure that you are outside this circle, you can check out one of the following articles: Choice or Phobia of Thinking ...

The third can also be summed up in her view that "Mafesh Fayed", why? Either because they have experienced and failed in their endeavors or because they saw those who went through the experiment and failed in their endeavors, and this experimental experimental mentality collapses and swings up and down without wondering about the reasons for going up and down, it remains a mere emotional "reaction" and in most cases resort to generalizing the result "The impact of the failed experience on the soul is very harmful, such as marriage experiences or the experiences of social reform that failed, but the wise does not rely on this situation, but begins to think about the reasons for lack of success, And brings to himself the hope derived from the source To survive the real Almighty.

Change for change

In contrast, the other trend sees that change is the year of life, and the rational person is the one who gets rid of every constant on the intellectual, the moral and even the moral level. Stability is the source of all conflict, pain, boredom, and hopelessness.

This vision may seem realistic at first, but if we drop it, we will find that a society without laws and moral constants is a society of chaos and constant conflict. There are disparities in capabilities, opportunities and participation in many material and moral needs. If there are no constants and laws The relationship between the members of the society and its unity will be transformed into a forest, with the right, with opportunities, not the opposite, at the community level. On the individual level, if we look at the youth of this group, we will find them highly dispersed on both the practical and intellectual levels Up to The idea and its opposite or total neutrality are adopted even in the most crucial issues, because there is no clear purpose for their actions. As a result of the lack of a clear balance of ideas, they find no activity, lecture, or training except to participate and find no new idea but to adopt it. "If you ask them why you adopted these ideas and left them, you will not have a logical reason for them, because they are immersed in a quantum" information "without a" how "or a clear balance. Help them analyze this quantum ...

Conscious change

We can conclude from the foregoing that change is needed, but not for itself, but for the purpose of, and most importantly, to be aware of the health of the road and to approach as much as possible the means leading to the very path, so as not to fall into the mistakes of "excessive and excessive" For change is to seek to move from one state to another; the result of "awareness" of what is best, which leads us to the definition of "consciousness", which Dr. Yahya Hoydi says "It is a kind of holistic thinking away from daily life, Work and behavior rather than stability "... and the meaning of the word" holistic "thinking in this To define that we think about the meanings that govern our actions and make sure that we have the correct understanding of them such as success, happiness, freedom, belonging and marriage ... In the goals that we seek to achieve from behind everything we do and choose not to indulge in the routine of daily life to the point that we are just machines or gears working without question and go without real meaning For its actions, and most importantly to realize that what is required is continuous action and endeavor, not stability, because it is not natural for human beings to settle at the time of testing and development opportunities.

Summary

In short, we should not seek a life partner without asking about the meaning of "marriage" and its purpose. We do not indulge in collecting information, attending lectures and adopting ideas and beliefs without awareness of the "quality" which will make this quantity fruitful and protect us from falling into contradiction, We do not waste our lives in working and collecting money without asking what the meaning of real "success" is. We do not follow the prevailing living systems related to social relations, food systems and everything related to the consumer system without examining and hoping for their happiness, which is difficult to achieve if we do not understand the meaning of the word " HE, "she said A state of thinking about what makes man human and distinguishes him from other assets, a state of conscious interaction with reality, a state of vigilance and desire, awakening that we feel rational beings and desire to achieve our presence and effective effect and not just presence and continuity.